Heterokonts/Stramenopiles – The Artful Amoeba http://theartfulamoeba.com A blog about the weird wonderfulness of life on Earth Tue, 11 Mar 2014 16:22:24 +0000 en-US hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=4.5.31 Mind the Rock Snot http://theartfulamoeba.com/2010/08/17/mind-the-rock-snot/ http://theartfulamoeba.com/2010/08/17/mind-the-rock-snot/#comments Wed, 18 Aug 2010 03:54:20 +0000 http://theartfulamoeba.com/?p=3531

Creative Commons Thorney¿?

Fly fisher(wo)men everywhere are mourning the loss of a cherished piece of equipment: their felt-soled waders. All too often now, clinging to the felt fibers are the tenacious strands of Didymosphenia geminata (did-em-o-sfeen’-ee-a jem-i-na’-ta), or, for the rest of us, rock snot.

The stuff looks like pre-owned toilet paper and apparently feels like wet cotton, and it’s slowly taking over the freshwater streams of the temperate world, smothering fish, insects, and other aquatic life. It spreads by hitchhiking on the gear of flyfishers, challenging slime molds, dandelions, and jellyfish for the non-human Plans for World Domination Cup. You can read all the gory details in New York Times articles here and here. But hidden inside that slimy brown mass is a work of remarkable beauty.

This.

With the lines of a Stradivarius and the detailing of a Fabergé egg, this baby is a microscopic work of art. If only its macroscopic manifestations could be so beautiful. As you may have guessed, it is a diatom (as covered here), a microscopic glass house (literally (littorally?) made of silicon dioxide) enclosing a little photosynthesizing alga.

At left you see two interesting features: The two long slits, or raphes, through which the diatom can secrete mucilage (aka slime) with which it slides over surfaces, and the porefield, through which it can secrete a mucopolysaccharide (aka slime) stalk that attaches it to a surface. The secretion and aggregation of these stalks is what causes the brown mess of rock snot, not the beautiful fiddle-like head.

In beauty, destruction. In destruction, beauty. This particular destruction brought to you by the otherwise largely upstanding diatoms, conveniently located in this sector of the tree of life. For all the scientific, er, dirt, on rock snot, including a beautiful scanning electron micrograph of the trouble-causing stalks, check out this EPA White Paper.

]]>
http://theartfulamoeba.com/2010/08/17/mind-the-rock-snot/feed/ 10
Help! Downy Mildews are Nomming My Pesto-to-Be http://theartfulamoeba.com/2010/06/27/help-downy-mildews-are-nomming-my-pesto-to-be/ http://theartfulamoeba.com/2010/06/27/help-downy-mildews-are-nomming-my-pesto-to-be/#comments Mon, 28 Jun 2010 04:21:58 +0000 http://theartfulamoeba.com/?p=3347

We are no longer the only phylum to discover these leaves are crazy delicious. Creative Commons paul goyette

It’s 1875. You’re a French winemaker. Your vineyards have only recently recovered from the trauma of grafting every single vine to American grape rootstock to avoid the plague of the accidentally-introduced American Phylloxera aphid, which nearly wiped out Europe’s wine industry in the Great French Wine Blight. And now, your vines are withering once more. The leaves are yellowing, the grapes and shoots are wrinkled or distorted, and covering everything is a white, downy fuzz. Congratulations: You’ve just acquired grape downy mildew, Plasmopara viticola, also recently accidentally-introduced from America, and 50 to 75 percent of your crop could be gone in a single season. Sacré bleu!

Several years would pass before the French botany professor Pierre-Marie-Alexis Millardet would walk by a vineyard in France’s renowned Medoc region of Bordeaux and notice a funny thing: the grapes next to the road looked much better than the grapes farther afield. What was up with that?

Now personally, I think that would have been perfect fodder for dial-in to Grape Talk, the 19th Century public radio show about grapes and grape repair. But Professor Millardet did the next best thing: he asked the locals what might be going on. And as it turned out, the growers were spattering their roadside vines with a visibile, poisonous substance like verdigris to deter hungry passersby from sampling their product. Inspired, Millardet went home, got out the chemistry set, played around, and in 1885, cooked up a solution of copper sulfate and calcium hydroxide(quick lime) that he thought worked best. Thus was born Bordeaux Mixture, the world’s first fungicide. France’s grapes were once again saved.

Fast forward to 2010. You’re a vegetable farmer in New York. You have only recently recovered from the 2009 trauma of dealing with late blight spread by big-box-store marketed tomatoes to home growers all over the east. And now, your entire basil crop is yellowing and spotty. Since consumers will not accept leaves with any blemish, it will be a total crop failure. Congratulations: You’ve just acquired the newest downy mildew epidemic to strike the world: basil blight, Peronospora belbahrii. Holy @%$*!

As reported by NPR this week and pointed out by alert reader kati, basil downy mildew is taking the east by storm. And by now you must be wondering, “Just what is this downy mildew stuff?” Good question. Because, in spite of its mildew moniker, it is not a fungus. Or at least not a fungus in the Fungus sense of the word. Lemme ‘splain.

In the ocean there are many things that swim and have fins. But not all are fish. Fish are only distantly related to whales and dolphins. But when the ancestors of whales and dolphins put out to sea, natural selection shaped them into a form quite similar to fish, who had the good sense to stay put all along and not mess around with that highfalutin’ land stuff. We call this convergent evolution.

In the case of what we call “fungi”, there are two distantly related groups who have evolved to look a lot alike. On the one hand, the true (capital-F) Fungi. On the other hand, we have the Oomycetes (oh-oh-MY-seats), or water molds, who may look like fungi and may be called (little-f) fungi, but decidedly are not taxonomically.

If these were humans, this would be censored. Oomycete sex: the large round oogonium containing the female gamete (egg) is fertilized by the smaller male "antheridium" borne on a separate filament or "hypha".

The funny name provides a clue to how oomycetes differ from true fungi: during sexual reproduction, they make egg-like structures called oogonia, which are fertilized by male structures called antheridia to form oospores. This is but one difference. There are others.

Oomycetes are heterokonts (aka stramenopiles, like brown algae and diatoms . . . remember?) which mean they have two kinds of flagella(propeller tails) for their swimming spores (zoospores). One is called the tinsel: it’s hairy and points forward. The other, the whiplash, points backward and is smooth. Both flagella are attached to the same point on the side of the zoospores, not the front or back.(The only true Fungi that possess flagella, the chytridiomycetes, have only a single, backward-directed flagellum)

Second, the cell walls of oomycetes contain, among other things, cellulose-like material (cellulose also being one of the major components of the cell walls of plants), unlike true fungi, which have chitin in their cell walls (the same stuff insects and crustaceans use to harden their shells). Interesting how the same molecules keep popping up all over life on Earth, isn’t it? It is likely that they evolved independently in all these groups, too. Kinda makes you think!

Finally, most fungi are haploid (contain only one copy of the blueprints) for most of their life. Oomycetes, on the other hand, are more like us: almost as soon as they make their gametes, they fuse them to restore two copies of their chromosomes to their cells.

Oomycetes can be (and often are) called fungi (lowercase f) if it is used as a common name, since they seem to have independently evolved into the same niche as fungi, (filamentous moisture-loving decayers and parasites), the same way that birds and bats, whales and fish, and cacti of America and Euphorbia of Africa have. Still, you wouldn’t call a whale a fish or a bat a bird. : )

Downy mildews are a sub-group within the oomycetes composed of the family Peronosporaceae. They have specialized on parasitizing higher plants. They make special highly developed branched sporangiophores (sporangium bearers) to hold their sporangia (See Fig. 7 here), or cells inside which spores develop. The sporangia make asexual spores, which in many downy mildews can be the zoospores with the tinsel and whiplash flagella that need water to get around. But in Peronospora, the genus killing our friendly basil plants, the sporangium just sends out a hypha (filament) to germinate, just like most true fungi, and calls it good.

What’s more, their sporangia are windborne, and can be blown from plant to plant without need of water. When combined with dense crop monocultures, this is a recipe for destruction, much as it was when early blight of potato (another oomycete but not another downy mildew) arrived in Ireland in the 1840s.

So where did our spunky new downy mildew come from? No one knows. Basil downy mildew was only reported once before the 21st century in Uganda in 1933. So this may be a mutation of a strain from Uganda, or it may be a species that evolved totally independently elsewhere. According to Margaret McGrath at my old Plant Pathology department at Cornell, the first report of this particular species was in Switzerland in 2001. From there it spread across Europe and thence came to Florida in October 2007. It has also spread (back?) to Asia and Africa. And it looks to be here to stay.

Like many fungi, this is a nasty parasite that can be almost impossible to rid yourself of once acquired, short of heavy fungicide application, which most people do not want to do to basil plants they plan to be eating. Cornell’s Margaret McGrath has only one piece of advice for the first time you find it on your basil: make pesto NOW.

To see how the heterokonts (aka stramenopiles) fit in to the rest of the eukaryotes (cells with nuclei), go here. Then click stramenopiles to find the oomycetes among the diatoms, brown algae, and other weird, obscure creatures.

]]>
http://theartfulamoeba.com/2010/06/27/help-downy-mildews-are-nomming-my-pesto-to-be/feed/ 1
Diatoms, or The Trouble With Life in Glass Houses http://theartfulamoeba.com/2010/03/28/diatoms-or-the-trouble-with-life-in-glass-houses/ http://theartfulamoeba.com/2010/03/28/diatoms-or-the-trouble-with-life-in-glass-houses/#comments Mon, 29 Mar 2010 00:11:21 +0000 http://frazer.northerncoloradogrotto.com/?p=2824

Diatoms: What Would Result if the Japanese Could Design their Own Microorganisms. These guys are screaming for a collector card set. Image by Rovag, Creative Commons Atribution 3.0 Unported License. Click for link.

Earlier this week I posted a link to Victorian microscope slides that included arranged diatom art. People really seemed to respond to the diatom image I posted with it, so I wanted to talk a little bit more about what diatoms are and a lot about their amazing shells. Diatoms literally live  in glass houses, and as you can imagine, that makes sex, growth, and buoyancy a tricky business. How do you have sex when you live in the architectural equivalent of a microscopic  petri dish? As they say — very carefully.

A diatom is a single-celled organism that is also considered an alga  — for values of algae that include “anything that photosynthesizes(makes food using light) but isn’t a plant or bacterium”. They are in a high-level taxon called Stramenopiles, or Heterokonts, a group that’s a grab bag of eukaryotic(cells with a nucleus) goodness that includes water molds (the oomycetes, a scion of which is responsible for the Irish Potato Famine), the fabulously cool and obscure slime nets (labrinthulids), and the brown algae. Here’s the tree so you can see how everyone’s related. Heterokonts are mostly algae, and the heterokontish algae are mostly diatoms. The name heterokont comes from the trait the group’s common ancestor likely developed of having two unequal propulsive tails called tinsel and whiplash flagella (love the names!), though some groups (including the diatoms) have mostly lost theirs. Believe it or not, the tinsel flagellum (so called because of all the little hairs on it) actually points forward and pulls the cell through the water.

But enough about Heterokonts/Stramenopiles. Diatoms live in pretty much any moist environment, including mud puddles, wet rocks, film on moss, etc., though they are most commonly found in fresh and saltwater. If you’ve ever swallowed lake or seawater, odds are you consumed some unlucky diatoms.

Somewhere along the way, probably in the Triassic or early Jurassic, diatoms discovered that making their shells out of silica (SiO2, aka glass) instead of cellulose, chitin, calcium carbonate or any other mineral/molecule/protein/sugar saved them 8% in energy costs compared to an organic wall and helped them compete in a crowded phytoplankton marketplace. The glass shells of diatoms have an incredible structure: they come in two halves called frustules (again, love the name!) that fit together like a pill box. For you engineers and artists in the audience, here’s your 1,000 words:

Schematic of diatom frustules. (A,B) Centric Diatoms. (A) girdle view, (B) valve view. (C,D,E) Pennate Diatom. (C) broad view, (D) valve view, (E) narrow girdle view (transverse section). Cupp, E.E. (1943). Marine Plankton Diatoms of the West Coast of North America. Bull. Scripps. Inst. Oceanogr. 5: 1-238 Image by Matt-eee, Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License. Click for link.

As may be obvious, centric diatoms are radially symmetrical, and pennate diatoms are bilaterally symmetrical (like us). The valves are the face plates and the girdles are the sides.

Here’s the problem with this system: when a diatom gets ready to divide, its shells pull apart and one goes with each daughter cell. Once these glass shells are formed, they can’t really be . . . er . . . expanded. With glass, you get what you get. One of the daughter cells gets the big frustule or epitheca, and one gets the little frustule that fits in it — the hypotheca. They both grow new shells that fit *inside* whatever shell they got. If you think about this, you’ll realize that one of these two daughter cells got the raw end of the deal — it can never get any bigger than its reduced-size shell. And one of its daughters will get an even rawer deal.

Carried out indefinitely, the cells keep dividing until they’re so small they simply die. That does not sound like the recipe for an evolutionary WIN. Diatoms could, I suppose, get by on the part of their population that always inherits the biggest shell. But that’s an increasingly small proportion of the population, and let’s face it: after a while that frustrule is starting to seem a bit shabby, out-of date, and funny-smelling.  So what is the escape from this evolutionary dead-end? I’m glad you asked!

Ta-Da!

Notice that the sperm have flagella that point *forward*. Those are the tinsel flagella, that pull the cell behind them. Image by Matt-eee, Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported license

Sex! Sex is the answer! (I know what you’re thinking: when is it not?) You have sex, grow your membrane out into a diatom shipyard, then build an entirely new and full-sized frustule inside. When you’re finished, you simply cast off your old-and-busted frustules and membranes, and Voila! New Diatom hotness!

The above solution is what the centric, or radially-valved diatoms do. Here’s what the rest of the diatoms do (warning: graphic diatom sex image):

Hey, baby, wanna swap nuclei? The life cycle of the pennate (not-radial) diatoms. Image by Matt, Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License. Click for link.

Incidentally, like women of a certain age, diatoms also have a biological clock. If they miss their time to mate and make a new initial cell, they just keep dividing until they get so small they die all alone. Aww. Sad diatom.

So why do these utilitarian glass shells have all these beautiful shapes and forms? I wish I knew. What purpose natural selection has found in them I can’t say, but I can say I appreciate the results — and I’m glad I don’t have to live in one.
]]>
http://theartfulamoeba.com/2010/03/28/diatoms-or-the-trouble-with-life-in-glass-houses/feed/ 8