corals – The Artful Amoeba https://theartfulamoeba.com A blog about the weird wonderfulness of life on Earth Tue, 11 Mar 2014 16:22:24 +0000 en-US hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=4.5.32 Photosynthesis in the Deep? https://theartfulamoeba.com/2010/11/15/photosynthesis-in-the-deep/ https://theartfulamoeba.com/2010/11/15/photosynthesis-in-the-deep/#comments Tue, 16 Nov 2010 05:16:07 +0000 http://theartfulamoeba.com/?p=3840 Away down deep in Hawaii, far from the reach of light you or I could see, lie spiny black corals. By deep, I’m talking deep — on the business end of 1000 feet. For a long time, no one thought these corals could host symbiotic algae, as most corals do, because there is so little light at those depths.

Yet that is precisely what scientists have found. In 71 percent of the black coral species examined at up to 1,300 feet beneath the surface, scientists found symbiotic algae either identical to or nearly identical to that found in surface corals. That’s amazing! What the heck are they doing there? Is the tiny amount of light that makes it enough to sustain them? Or do they retain their photosynthetic apparatus in spite of not using it? Do the corals simply keep algae because there’s no great cost to *not* doing so, and it’s already programmed into their genes?

Black corals, like all coral, are actually cnidarians like jellyfish, anemones, and sea pens. In essence, they are animals that have taken up underwater lichenization: primary colonizers that slowly build up the infrastructure (lichens: soil, coral: calcium carbonate high-rises and sand) that will support other life. But instead of fungi trapping eukaryotic (nucleated) green algae or cyanobacteria (as in lichens), we have colonial cnidarians trapping dinoflagellates called zooxanthellae. Each little coral individual, or polyp, is like an upside down, anchored jellyfish (complete with little particle-trapping, retractable tentacles) with photosynthetic dinoflagellate tenants inside. Black coral polyps aren’t black, but their skeletons are. Black corals also have tiny spines on their skeletons, lending them the name “spiny thorn coral”.

Let’s have a closer look at the renters:

Symbiodinium -- the dinoflagellate zooxanthellae of black corals too. Creative Commons David Patterson and Mark Farmer. Non-Commercial Use Only.

Look carefully: you will see little brown spots, which are the symbionts inside the symbionts; that is, their own endosymbiotic chloroplasts, which were once photosynthetic bacteria. At some point long ago, they themselves were sucked in by an ancestral dinoflagellate and co-opted for its own personal use.

Corals aren’t the only ones that keep dinoflagellate food replicators right inside them (“Cellulose. Earl Grey. Hot.”): Other organisms that can host zooxanthellae — several of which, unless you’re a biologist, you’ve probably never heard of —  include jellyfish, clams, foraminifera, sea slugs, ciliates, and radiolaria. Depending on how you look at it, these algae are either getting free stays and all-you-can-make buffets left and right in the ocean, or they are getting bullied by half the kids in school. The relationship between the dinoflagellate and its coral hosts, in particular, seems ambiguous as best right now; while some scientists argue they benefit from the association, others say the coral is holding them captive and forcing them to do its bidding (in support, they point out that the algae can reproduce perfectly fine — and many times faster — on their own. The same is not true for the coral). The same arguments have been made for the lichen association, and I think the jury is still out on that one too.

Not all dinoflagellates are zooxanthellae, or photosynthetic symbionts. Nor are they even all photosynthetic. About half are not. They’re called dinoflagellates (supposedly) due to their whirling (dinos) whips (flagella), or tails. In the photo above, you should be able to see the trailing, or longitudinal flagellum which the dinoflagellate uses to propel itself, and the transverse flagellum, which wraps around the equator of the cell. Both of these flagella may come with their own ridged, groovy wrap-around exterior storage compartments, delightfully called the cingulum and sulcus. The transverse flagellum mostly stays in its groove and is believed to function as a rudder. Here are some pictures that might give you a better feel for how all this fits*.

But the chloroplasts of these creatures tell an amazing story. In most plants, chloroplasts (and mitochondria) have two membranes, which scientists believe is evidence that chloroplasts and mitochondria use to be free-living bacteria before they were tamed and fused with ancestral eukaryotic cells like our own (presumably, by one ancient cell trying to eat another and failing, with the indigestion-causing bacterium going on to start working for the cell. You know what they say . . . if you can’t beat ’em . . . ). But they’ve also long known that some marine algae have an even cooler situation: three or more membranes. What could be the explanation? Well, they seem to be evidence of multiple endosymbioses, or failed eating attempts that resulted in a cooperative relationship. And some of them were of algae, not just bacteria. In some zooxanthellae, there’s still a vestigial nucleus of one of those ancient algal victims wedged between some of the plastid membranes! So in essence, black corals are symbionts inside symbionts inside symbionts inside symbionts . . . you get the idea. Amazing!

A few final details about dinoflagellates — some of them also possess light-sensing eyespots, and one species has the smallest known eye. When corals bleach in water that is too hot (an increasingly common occurrence these days), they expel their zooxanthellae and die — and the loss of the algae’s colored pigments is responsible for the sudden whitening. And finally, a separate, free living group of dinoflagellates are the organisms responsible for the annoying and neurotoxic phenomenon you may know as a red tide.

But, while interesting, none of this helps explain why corals at extreme depths would retain the same or nearly same algae as corals found within feet of the surface. Here’s the conventional wisdom:

Hermatypic (reef-building) corals largely depend on zooxanthellae, which limits that coral’s growth to the photic zone.

I’m not an oceanographer, but it seems to me that below 1,000 feet deep is not the photic (light) zone. Perhaps the algae are the equivalent of cave fish: blind and pale but still fish in every other way. Sounds like a job for a dissecting scope . . . or are they eking by on the .0000001% (aprox.) of light that makes it that deep? Given that some black corals have been judged over 4,000 years old, with growth rates as low as 4 micrometers per year, perhaps that’s not out of the realm of possibility . . .

________________________________________________

*Tron dinoflagellate courtesy of Kennesaw State University.

]]>
https://theartfulamoeba.com/2010/11/15/photosynthesis-in-the-deep/feed/ 7
Lacy Double Take https://theartfulamoeba.com/2009/06/25/lacy-double-take/ https://theartfulamoeba.com/2009/06/25/lacy-double-take/#comments Fri, 26 Jun 2009 04:20:55 +0000 http://frazer.northerncoloradogrotto.com/?p=659 The other day I was walking by the coffee table at work and noticed a Science magazine cover that made me do a 180. First, take a look at this. Now examine this:

Credit: George Shepherd. Used with permission; click image for link.

Credit: George Shepherd. Used with permission; click image for link.

Striking, no? And strange as it may seem, neither one of these creatures was the inspiration for the Boston street “grid”. Those Bostonians thought that one up all on their own.

This would be, I believe, another form of our old friend convergent evolution. So what the heck are these two things? Well, the cover of Science is a closeup of a tropical coral called Favia speciosa. I believe the lacy network (scientists would call it “reticulated” or “reticulate”, which is just a fancy Latin term for “net-like”. Gladiators with tridents and nets were called “retiarii”) is the bony calcite skeleton of the coral, the walls between each individual animal or “polyp”. During the night (or whenever they get peckish), they poke their little heads out and filter feed the water with teeny, finger-like tentacles.

The second image is, of course, one of my favorite — and distinctly terrestrial — creatures: a pretzel slime mold, Hemitrichia serpula. This is one of those plasmodial slime molds I get so excited about that starts out as two individual and microscopic amoebae in the soil who meet, have coffee, realize they share the same values, desire for spores, and that all-important “chemistry”, and decide to fuse and grow into a giant, gelatinous, pulsating bag of cytoplasm that goes on an insane bacteria-eating rampage.

When the time has come for the blessed event, instead of making individual bulbous sporangia (places where spores are made) like the slime mold in the photo at the top of this page, H. serpula simply freezes into a netlike structure and subdivides its entire body into a giant spore mass. I believe this structure goes by the beautiful name “aethalium” (pronounced “ee-THAL-ium”. Should name first-born daughter “Aethalia”).

UPDATE 7/23/09: George Shepherd informs me that this reproductive structure is a plasmodiocarp, not an aethalium. I’m working on figuring out the difference between the two, but when I do I’ll post it here.

After drying out, the structure splits open and a fuzzy mass of spores flies out and blows away in the wind. In the photo above, you can see this is already starting to happen.

]]>
https://theartfulamoeba.com/2009/06/25/lacy-double-take/feed/ 3