A Trip Down the Microbial Rabbit Hole

by Jennifer Frazer on October 31, 2009

“Where the telescope ends, the microscope begins. Which of the two has the grander view?” – Victor Hugo

I think you all know how I would answer that question.

Pollen from sunflower (Helianthus annuus), morning glory Ipomoea purpurea, hollyhock (Sildalcea malviflora), lily (Lilium auratum), primrose (Oenothera fruticosa) and castor bean (Ricinus communis). 500X magnification; the bean-shaped pollen grain at lower left if 50 micrometers (μm) long. Believe it or not, these microbes are actually an entire male plant -- the gametophyte.

Pollen from sunflower, morning glory, hollyhock, lily, primrose, and castor bean plants. 500X magnification; the bean-shaped pollen grain at lower left if 50 micrometers (μm) long. Believe it or not, these microbes are actually an entire plant -- the male gametophyte.

This blog is all about the variety of life, but part of that variety are the enormously different scales at which life can exist. You may know blue whales are the largest animals (ever, actually. Ever.), but they are not the largest organisms. Trees (aspen are notorious for this — one called Pando in Utah in paticular), fungi (remember the humongous fungus?), and perhaps a mediterranean sea grass called Posidonia oceanica can grow to many square kilometers courtesy their ability to grow asexually and keep at it for thousands of years. Life exists in a contiuum from these titans all the way down to the tiniest bacteria and archaea, the smallest of which are in the 200-400 nanometer range, round about the size of the measles virus.

Now the University of Utah has created an animation with a simple slider bar that takes you from coffee bean to carbon atom and back again. Check it out! Notice, for example, the amoeba (yay! Our site mascot!) approaches the size of the grain of salt and is visible to the naked eye when the animation is zoomed all the way out. If I were a bacterium or yeast cell, I’d cower too!

Notice also that mitochondria, the descendants of bacteria engulfed by ancestral eukaryotic cells (all cells except bacteria and archaea) billions of years ago, are actually slightly bigger than, but still more or less the same size as, E. coli. Notice that measles virus next to it — which gives the scale for the tiniest known cells mentioned above. Zoom in and out to compare this to the size of the amoeba or paramecium, and think about the fact they are both what we call “single-celled organisms”. Yet if the biggest amoeba or smallest bacterium had eyes, they probably wouldn’t be able to see each other. They are an order of magnitude (1000 times) different in size — and the difference is 10 times the difference between blue whales and us!

Don’t miss the question at the bottom either, which shows what amazing packers you boys are. A sample:

How can an X chromosome be nearly as big as the head of the sperm cell?

No, this isn’t a mistake. First, there’s less DNA (half as much, actually –jf) in a sperm cell than there is in a non-reproductive cell such as a skin cell. Second, the DNA in a sperm cell is super-condensed and compacted into a highly dense form. Third, the head of a sperm cell is almost all nucleus. Most of the cytoplasm has been squeezed out in order to make the sperm an efficient torpedo-like swimming machine.

Why do I get the feeling that last sentence will inordinately please the gentlemen out there? : )

{ 6 comments }

The Other Expired Marine Monsters

by Jennifer Frazer on October 30, 2009

There’s been news on the giant marine predators front. Now, don’t get me wrong, they’re still extinct and all (I know, I know). But  . . .

The pliosaur Kronosaurus, ancestor of xxx. Still NOT a dinosaur. Would you believe this animal is in the sister group to snakes?

The pliosaur Kronosaurus. Still NOT a dinosaur.

… this week New Scientist’s cover story took a closer look at the four major taxa of marine reptiles, in all their incarnations from the Permian to the Big Cretaceous Sleep. I covered two of them in my post on “Sea Monsters” — the plesiosaurs and the mosasaurs — but there are two others: the icthyosaurs and the pliosaurs. You should definitely have a look.

And scientists announced this week that they had found the skull of a giant pliosaur in the UK that could have measured 16 meters (52 feet) long – only two meters shorter than the current pliosaur record-holder, a Pliosaurus found in Oxfordshire, UK, that was so big you could fit your arm in its tooth sockets.

wiki_Spitsbergen

Able I was ere I saw Svalbard.

New pliosaur specimens have been popping up all over recently. They come from Mexico, the UK, and the island of Spitsbergen in the Hoth-like waste of the Norwegian Svalbard archipelago, which is apparently bursting with pliosaur brittle (thousands of skeletons are presently weathering out in the choice spot). Two massive pliosaur specimens (est. length 15 m.) were excavated recently there and dubbed (in King-Kong-worthy choices) “The Monster” and “Predator X”.

The icthyosaurs(fish-lizards) — which resembled dolphins even more strongly than the short-necked plesiosaurs — were dominant marine reptiles in the Triassic and early Jurassic. Some small species had freakishly large frisbee-sized eyes (for reasons revealed in the NS article). But some had bodies to match — and this is relatively recent news too. It was only in 2004 that an icthyosaur — Shonisaurus — the size of a fin whale (the second-largest living animal) was found in British Columbia.

Why were neither of these creatures in “Sea Monsters”? The icthyosaurs died out for unknown reasons by the time “Sea Monsters” was. . . er . . . “filmed”. So had the largest pliosaurs.

The New Scientist article also features a difficult to find but stunningly informative and useful family tree and size comparison chart for the four groups. Make sure to blow that puppy up so you can actually read it.

One final note . . bear in mind that the animals in the New Scientist tree (and our current maximum size estimates for particular groups) represent what we know based only on the fossils we’ve happened to find. There may have been many more varieties of huge marine reptiles in these four groups — or maybe another major group – and any of them could be larger or weirder than we’ve ever imagined. Good specimens may never have fossilized properly, purely by chance. The fossils may be buried in rock layers that aren’t currently much exposed at the surface, and are waiting miles underground to be exposed thousands or millions of years hence (or never). Or long ago they may have weathered out and eroded back into the sea whence they came or been sucked down into the mantle and obliterated.  Odds are we are seeing only a slim fraction of what once existed.

And that is true for all life, especially in the squishy-little-creature category of which I’m such a fan. Biologists, perhaps even more than historians, have reason to lament our inability to time travel. Oh, what wonders we might see if we could. The fossil record, with all its glorious variety, is the merest hint of the splendor that really was, that really happened, and that we will never, never know.

{ 1 comment }

The Bloodbelly Comb Jelly's Bad*** Soundtrack

by Jennifer Frazer on October 24, 2009

Don’t you wish you had an ubercool espionage movie soundtrack to accompany you wherever you go? I know I do. Make sure to hit the HQ button if you have the bandwidth.

Actually, I quite wish they’d present more nature videos this way. Do these jellies not have the feel of sleek hyper-space cruisers in this short film? It befits the coolness I think these organisms have, rather than the hysterical watch-me-nearly-die antics and 4th-grade scripting approach (Top 10 most venomous animals!) which many popular modern animal shows lure viewers (A favorite card game of mine parodies one particularly popular version as “The Animal Bothering Show”). These images were captured by a remote rover operated by the Monterey Bay Aquarium, where presumably one very cool member of the staff thought to include the soundtrack. Anyone know where it’s really from?

So let’s talk about this particularly cool creature, Lampocteis cruentiventer. Their stomachs are always blood red; their bodies may come in various shades of the color. They can grow up to about 6 inches long — about the size of a hand — and they swim from about 1,000 to 3,300 feet down. That’s pretty deep, but not abyssal. Still, they probably never see much of the light of day.

Which, strangely enough, explains their brilliant red coloring. Red light is filtered most efficiently by water, and after traveling a few hundred feet down, there is very little left. Thus organisms that are red will appear gray or black in the deep, like a hole in the water. Thus, many deep sea creatures, when illuminated by explorers’ lights, appear lurid red.

Now let’s say, for the sake of argument, you live in the dark and like to eat things that glow. But dang it, you’re transparent! Now breakfast is causing you a bit of a problem that cannot be solved by Rolaids. Solution: encase your stomach in the undersea version of air raid curtains — red pigment. Hence the bloodbelly. (Although it does sound a bit like a better name for a grizzled jazz musician: “Good Evening, Ladies and Gentlemen. My name is Blood Belly and tonight I’m going to play a little number for you I like to call . . . “)

Comb jellies are ctenophores (“ten’-o-fours”), which have eight cilia-bearing (small beating filaments) combs called ctenes with which they weakly swim. Whenever I have been lucky enough to visit an aquarium, I have spent many long minutes fogging up the glass staring at the undulating cilia of comb jellies. It’s a fascinating riot of colors and textures. The cilia make these the largest creatures to swim by such a mechanism, and give them a superficial resemblance to overgrown Paramecia. Both jellyfish and ctenophores have two cell layers separated by a gooey center, the mesogloea (mes-o-glee-a). This is a chief way they differ from us “higher” animals, who have a fancy middle layer we’ve parleyed into stomachs, livers, brains, gall bladders, spleens, appendices, giblets etc. Go us!

Comb jellies can also have two long tentacles. Instead of the famous stinging nematocysts that true jellyfish bear on their tentacles, comb jellies  have sticky cells called colloblasts that rupture to release glue that captures their prey. They then retract the tentacles to bring their food to their mouths. Unlike jellyfish, which have a single opening to serve as mouth and anus (thank GOD evolution didn’t stick that particular system in vertebrates), ctenophores have one opening at the mouth and two at the back, though all three may serve when nature calls.

Scientists, as with most groups, are fighting constantly about how cnidarians(jellyfish, corals, and friends), ctenophores, and every animal more complex (usually referred to as a group called “Bilateria”, all the mirror-image symmetry animals) are related. As it’s a fight that’s enormously complicated and still ongoing, I will spare you the details. Suffice it to say, they ARE related. Here is one possible family tree.

One final note — ctenophores are also clearly an inspiration for the creatures in the 1989 movie “The Abyss“, a sci-fi classic you should see if you have not (though many in the know urge finding the director’s cut). A personal favorite. See here and here for some striking examples.

Discovered via Deep Sea News.

{ 7 comments }

When Plesiosaurs Ruled the Sea

by Jennifer Frazer on October 19, 2009

Our heroine . . . Dolichorhynchops . . . and her droogs.

Our heroine . . . Dolichorhynchops . . . and her droogs.

Some life is weird by virtue of time delay. If the inhabitants of the Cretaceous Seaway — the long strip of semi-shallow ocean that flooded middle North America some 82 million years ago — could see the vast blubbery mammals that inhabit the seas today, they would no doubt think them odd. And tasty.

But it so happens we live now, not 82 million years ago, and it is we that them them odd. You see, in that time, the oceans were filled not with mammals who put out to sea, but with reptiles who did. Large reptiles. With nasty big pointy teeth.

The niche presently occupied by dolphins was occupied by icthyosaurs (although they had gone extinct by 90 million years ago) and small plesiosaurs like the four-finned marine reptile Dolichorhynchops (Do-li-ko-rin’-kops), the Lambda-class shuttle of the Cretaceous Seaway. That of the Loch Ness Monster was occupied by long-necked plesiosaurs. And the niche occupied by sharks was occupied by mosasaurs and . . . well. . . sharks.

Growing up, I was curious about these mysterious seas and the creatures that inhabited them. But I only had a dim idea of what they were like because the only places to find them were line drawings in books or bones in museums, where they generally took a big backseat to media-darling dinosaurs. Because, and this is a big point to remember, folks – especially if you’re talking to paleontologists – these sea creatures are not dinosaurs. Not Dinosaurs. Remember that. In my college dinosaurs textbook (“Dinosaurs: The Textbook”), one of only two places pleiosaurs show up is in the section on ancient reptiles that are not dinosaurs. Dinosaurs, according to “Dinosaurs: The Textbook”, can be most easily thought of as a group of extinct reptiles having an upright (not sprawling or swimming) posture. Paleontologists seem quite sensitive on this point.

Enter Sea Monsters: A Prehistoric Adventure — the latest (first?) offering by National Geographic in the world of gargantuan IMAX films. It seeks to fill in this Cretaceous-Seaway-sized gap in our collective imagination. To see the trailer for “Sea Monsters: A Prehistoric Adventure”, click here. I saw this at the Denver Museum of Nature and Science two weeks ago at a special screening with a lecture on the science behind the film by paleontologist Ken Carpenter. A Dolichorhynchops is the heroine of the film, but the directors couldn’t resist shortening her name to the overly-cute “Dolly”( Can’t we just say Dolichorhynchops? Please? Is it really that much harder to say than Dmitri Medvedev or Boutros Boutros-Ghali?).

The directors worked with Carpenter to develop the most scientifically accurate reconstructions of these creatures possible. And wow, what a wonderful job they did. Though the plot is a bit treacly (hence the moniker “Cretaceous Bambi” bestowed on the film by Carpenter at the end of my screening), the animations are stunning. Though assuredly, there are gratuitous eye-candy shots of the giant predatory mosasaur Tylosaurus leaping in slow-mo toward the viewer for the benefit of the 3D patrons, they also made sure to include some ostensibly less-glamorous creatures. A mating swarm of glowing red ammonites, for instance. And they used an absolutely fantastic “time lapse” device to illustrate the incomprehensibly vast sweep of geologic time.

Carpenter explained that the filmmakers took pains to vet every detail, behavior and design to make sure they were realistic as possible. He’d circle errors and write in corrections on stills. He’d endure marathon hours-long phone-call editing sessions. The directors even persuaded a husband and wife team of professional swimmers to latch on to one another and don plesiosaur flippers to test how a creature like Dolichorhynchops with four fixed fins might have used them in practice. They quickly found they must beat together to get anywhere, and the animators found while working with their computer models that the fins couldn’t flip up – a detail that paleontologists had missed until the animators pointed it out.

The human parts of the plot are, however, far less successful than the reconstructed animals. Poor acting. Poor scripting. I cringed. At one point, a fossil is being “excavated” by some paleontologists — but you can clearly see the outlines of the fake fossil cast they apparently plonked in the ground to stand in for a real fossil.

But far worse than that were the scripted “scientist” scenes, which I hated the for all the same reasons I hate Macgillivray-Freeman films: cheesy, fakey dialogue and acting and totally unrealistic depictions of scientists. The lead female scientist was particularly unbelievable, inauthentic, smug and annoying. I have worked with women scientists. I know women scientists. Women scientists are friends of mine. Madam, you’re no woman scientist.

In short, she falls victim to the Elizabeth Shue effect. Ever see “The Saint”? The last decent Val Kilmer movie in which he plays a man of many disguises who falls for the impossibly beautiful, but completely unconvincing physicist? It’s not that some female scientists aren’t beautiful — see Lisa Randall. But when directors hire gorgeous actresses to play brainy scientists, the results are usually not good (exception: Jodi Foster). I mean, come on — how many female scientists do you know that look perfectly coifed and attired with a chic haircut and perfect make-up to go digging in the dirt of backwater Kansas? Couldn’t we film some real scientists on a dig for some relevant fossils rather than relying on fake scientists with even faker dialogue? In my opinion, it isn’t fair to kids to misrepresent science this way. They’re trying to turn them on to science, and to my adult brain at least, the result is both misleading and a turn-off. For a film that took such pains with getting even the tiniest angle of a fin on a fish in the background just right, why couldn’t they take such pains with the depiction of science and scientists?

Still, the movie works more often than not and it captures a world whose story has gone untold far too long. At one point, “Dolly” barely escapes death by shark, but she doesn’t escape having a back flipper nipped and permanently tucked. And sure enough, as Carpenter showed us in his slide show, scientists have actually found a fossil Dolichorhynchops flipper with its back edge missing a shark-bite sized piece.

Just don’t forget Lesson #1. One of the very first slides in Carpenter’s presentation was a dinosaur with a big red circle with a line through it. He took questions after the film, and an audience member asked something about the dinosaurs in the movie. Carpenter looked as though he’d just been hit by a sniper. “Oooooh . . . ” he winced. “NOT dinosaurs.”

To see if the film is playing in your area, click here.

{ 3 comments }

Marine Mucilage: Why They Make Marine Kleenex

by Jennifer Frazer on October 13, 2009

And not to be confused with Marine Muesli. I know you’re disappointed.

Apparently, in addition to all things jelly, I’m fascinated by all things blobby. You’ll note the restraint I used in not posting anything about that blob they found floating off the coast of Alaska last summer. It seemed obvious right from the start that that was simply your run-of-the mill algal bloom. These blobs, on the other hand, would quite mystify me without  the help of a reassuring National Geographic narrator.

I’m pretty sure this is the same stuff that builds up in the water you leave the dishes in the sink too long. Is it just me or did you also half-expect to see an eyeball or two floating around in one of those things?

It seems like this may be some sort of biofilm, which is a very sexy subject in the world of biology right now. Biofilms are essentially thin coats of bacteria and bacterial slime (technically known as extracellular polymeric substance, or EPS) on teeth, stream cobbles, catheters, lawyers, etc. (just kidding lawyers! Don’t sue!)  These things are apparently everywhereeven on the thin skin of water at the surface of the ocean — and this way of life represents an up-till-now severely underappreciated bacterial lifestyle. 99 percent of bacteria may live in biofilms.

And yet  these don’t seem like classic biofilms as they aren’t tightly packed or adhered to a surface. They seem to be somewhere in the no-man’s-land between a biofilm and marine snow, the slow rain of decaying microbial matter that eventually coats the ocean floor. Both marine snow and mucilages incorporate much more than just bacteria — like crustaceans, plankton and viruses. For whatever reason the marine snow in the northeastern Mediterranean is piling up faster than the life in the water column or on the sea floor can take it out. Which seems odd, because in the deep sea, the locals will quickly consume anything that isn’t ballistic-grade plastic, and I’m pretty sure they have their R&D departments working on that too.

Whatever they are, they are unusual, and probably prospering by climate change. I love weird manifestations of life, but there is good-weird and there is bad-weird. The kind of weird that smothers fish and spreads E. coli is definitely bad-weird.

For the PLoS paper that inspired this video, click here.

{ 0 comments }

Atsa Lotta Sushi: The First Giant Squid on Film

by Jennifer Frazer on October 10, 2009

This is really old news, but since I mentioned it in my last post, I wanted to show you just how recently we finally captured images of live giant squid (Architeuthis dux) . The first still image came only in 2002 after a squid was towed to a harbor in Japan. The first video came in 2006. Here is the original footage as presented on Japanese TV in December 2006.

Is that narrator like our movie-trailer guy? It sure seem like he does the voice work for all Japanese newscasts and game shows. When that triumphant music comes on, I imagine he’s saying something like, “Congratulations! You caught and filmed a giant squid. You have now leveled up.” Here is the National Geographic Society’s take on the catch, complete with a better photo.

You’ll note at 0:35 the squid shoots some water out of its funnel, its “jet engine”. Squid fill their mantle (the large upper hood) with water and squeezes it out through this side tube to move forward. Also note that this squid is a young female. As in, it was a mere 24 feet long, and this species can approach 60 feet — implying it is just 1/3 of maximum estimated size.

Why is it incredible we only recently recovered images and film?

Scientists have known for over a century that giant squid from the beaks and pieces they dredged out of sperm whale stomachs. Dead specimens had washed up on shores in Newfoundland and New Zealand, from which one lucky specimen even made it to the Rev. Moses Harvey’s bathtub.

Wiki_Logy_bay_giant_squid_1873

Bathtub technology has advanced considerably since 1873.

But because these creatures live in one of the most inacessible habitats on Earth — the cold, black benthic zone — live specimens eluded photography (and, for the most part, capture) for another 125 years. The Smithsonian’s specimens both came from Spain in 2005, and you can find the details on their capture and display here.

Giant squid aren’t the only tentacled terrors cruising the depths and hiding from cameras. Though scientists had known since the 1920s about the even larger colossal squid (Mesonychoteuthis hamiltoni) that haunts the treacherous Southern Ocean, the first images, film, and intact collection of this living creature were made only in 2007 by a New Zealand fishing crew longlining for Antarctic toothfish. Colossal squid can reach 46 feet long but have much larger and heavier mantles than giant squid.

As worrisome as all I’ve said so far may be to consider were one, say, out on a pleasure swim at 1,500 meters in squid-infested waters, consider this: not only is the colossal squid considerably larger and bulkier than the giant squid (although its arms are generally shorter), it also possesses hooks on its tentacles. Some swivel. Some have multiple prongs.

*Shudder*

H.P. Lovecraft, eat your heart out.

Squid are cephalopods, which are in turn mollusks. To see a good mollusk family tree, click here. For the technical cephalopod tree, see the Tree of Life Web Project. Not for the faint of heart.

{ 3 comments }

Tridented Trilobites and Giant Squid: The Sant Ocean Hall

by Jennifer Frazer on October 8, 2009

My old college friend and NIH postdoc Laurie Waters with an actual GIANT SQUID. It wasn't so long ago scientists were still wondering whether these actually exist.

My old college friend and NIH postdoc Laurie Waters with an actual GIANT SQUID. It wasn't so long ago scientists were still debating whether these actually existed.

Washington, DC, did not disappoint. The highlight was the Sant Ocean Hall in the Smithsonian Museum of Natural History, newly opened a year ago after a major remodeling of the cross hall it sits in. The hall soars and boasts a life-size whale model; the exhibits beckon with enticing photographs, movies, and a spherical screen on which swirling ocean currents flow across a spinning globe to eerily convincing effect. Welcome to the future.

A brief tour of my favorites . . .

Above is the super-awesome giant squid, appropriately locked inside a riveted metal case lest it suddenly come back to life, break the glass, and start pillaging and marauding the museum. It was the first time I had seen a specimen in real life, and I must confess that although it was suitably enormous, it seemed smaller (but not shorter) than I expected. That is, of course, easy for me to say as I stand there staring at it from the right side of a riveted glass case, and would, perhaps, be less so were I to encounter one in its natural milieu. As I often say when explaining why I won’t hike solo in the backcountry, I’m really quite snackable. The specimen in the case above is the female; the male was smaller and displayed in an ID4-aliens-suspended-in-goo style pose in a case nearby. Very cool, boys.

Washington DC Oct 2009 052

Here’s the entrance to the biodiversity display, with perhaps my least favorite part of the exhibit: a boring definition of biodiversity. “Marine biodiversity is the varity of life in the ocean. It is enormously complex. Scientists try to make sense of this diversity by organizing marine organisms according to evoluntionary . . . zzzz” Come on, guys! You can do better than that! How about “Biodiversity is the blizzard of lifeforms that coat the planet with bizarre beauty. It is nematode trapping fungi, slime nets, and nudibranchs that ripple through the water like Spanish dancers. . . ”

Sigh. Fortunately, the rest of the exhibit made up for this lapse. Although organized a bit confusingly, it was a nice blend of museum specimens, photographs, and strategically chosen videos that startled viewers with short clips of subjects like cephalopods’ astounding shapeshifting abilities. Some examples:

Washington DC Oct 2009 055
Laurie again, with the echinoderms.

Washington DC Oct 2009 057

Various worms, including gorgeous polychaete annelid christmas tree worm at upper left.

Washington DC Oct 2009 065

The very cool Ediacaran fossil of Tribrachidium, a pillow-like creature from what is commonly referred to as life’s first experiment in multicellularity. This is one of my very favorite organisms ever, and dates from over 550 million years ago. And what a stunning fossil! They had many other famous Ediacaran specimens.

And they had crinoids, or sea lillies, galore. I am sorry my photos didn’t come out better, because these specimens preserved incredible detail. Many had the architectual gestalt of gothic cathedrals. Here is a better photo from National Geographic.

Washington DC Oct 2009 066

And then there was this fantastic beauty — I had never seen or heard of anything like this in my life, and I even made it halfway through “Trilobites” by Richard Fortey:

Washington DC Oct 2009 068

There’s really only one acronym for this: W.   T.   F.

As you can see in the placard, the Hail Mary Pass of paleontology is “It may have been used for mating.” (Props to Laurie for pointing that out. : ) )

No ocean hall is complete without a giant jellyfish.

Washington DC Oct 2009 056

And no visit to Ocean Hall is complete without getting a fuzzy, out of focus shot of oneself with said giant jellyfish.

Washington DC Oct 2009 058

This picture pretty much sums up my feelings on the Sant Ocean Hall, in spite of its relatively minor shortcomings. For another perspective, see this review by the New York Times.

{ 0 comments }

Stalking Mushrooms for Science

by Jennifer Frazer on September 30, 2009

That lurid orange stripe wasn't visible until vivisection. Neither were the blue maggot holes. Mmmmm. . . maggoty.

That lurid orange stripe wasn't visible until vivisection. Neither were the blue maggot holes. Mmmmm. . . maggot holes. Locations redacted to protect the innocent.

In all the excitement over the ladybugs, I completely forgot to mention I spent the weekend before scouring an undisclosed location for fungi for the 2009 Rocky Mountain National Park Mycoblitz. Citizen science in action!

Our Mycoblitz was the brainchild of past Colorado Mycological Society president Rob Hallock (hi Rob!), but it is an example of an increasingly popular endeavor called a “bioblitz“. In these events, teams of volunteers and scientists sweep a few select landscapes for one to two days collecting as many organisms of particular groups as they can. They hope to get a snapshot of the biodiversity of a particular place and time.

Last year’s mycoblitz was (I believe) the first bioblitz ever held in a national park. The picture of me with the very exciting slime mold from my “About” page was taken at that event. This year we purposely chose to do the event a month later — in September — to try a capture a different assortment of fruiting fungi. And by all accounts, we succeeded. My team was able to find the first jelly fungus recorded in RMNP and a very special yell0w-staining Ganoderma — and seven of our 25 specimens found a permanent home in the herbarium in Denver.

Here are some more pictures of this year’s blitz — starting with one of some various mycoblitz ne’er do wells. . . : )

September 2009 050

One of our two identifiers was Vera Evenson, Curator of the Denver Botanic Gardens Herbarium of Fungi and author of Mushrooms of Colorado and the Southern Rocky Mountains, which I highly recommend to anyone interested in that subject. Vera’s hiding in the picture above, examining a specimen very closely. On the left you can also see the food dehydrators we used to preserve all our specimens.

Below is the other identifier, Michael Kuo of mushroomexpert.com. Michael is both an English teacher and amateur mycologist who’s written the books 100 Edible Mushrooms and Morels. Michael makes me a little embarrassed that I haven’t done more with my life.

September 2009 051

And finally, here’s our hearty crew at the campsite in Moraine Park. We were lucky enough to be there during the elk rut, and their beautiful (and sometimes comical) calls were everywhere. A few even wandered into that field in the background and we could see them with our binocs.

September 2009 053

See what you can experience by volunteering for science? Stunning views! Elk calls! Orange mushrooms! Starlight! Toasted marshmallows! Lots and lots of accession tags! Clothes that smell like smoking logs (and only that if you’re lucky!)

So keep your eyes and ears open for opportunities. Citizen science is yet another way you can serve your country, make no mistake. At this year’s blitz, a retired policeman and schoolteacher who had never done science before saw an ad about the blitz in the newspaper and just decided to show up. They joined my team and found the majority of the specimens that were chosen from our collection to be deposited in the herbarium. So watch for big opportunities like the Christmas Bird Count, or small opportunities like our little mycoblitz. Uncle Sam wants you for science, too.

Speaking of Uncle Sam, I will be doing my civic duty this weekend by visiting Washington, DC, for the first time ever. I’ll be making my pilgrimage (hopefully) to the Smithsonian, where I may just find some delights to share with you, provided they allow photography. As such, no posts until mid- to late next week.

Have a great fall weekend! Get out there and discover some weird stuff in the woods. : )

{ 0 comments }

The Ladybugs' Block Party

by Jennifer Frazer on September 27, 2009

September 2009 057

This weekend I climbed to the top of Green Mountain for the first time. If you are familiar with Boulder, it is the right mountain of the two bearing flatirons visible from town. But the top didn’t just contain the usual stunning views. As I neared it, I noticed a few small swarms of lady bugs. Notice the plants on the left. Here’s what was on those plants:

September 2009 059

And as I climbed higher, I steadily saw more. Soon the ladybug population exploded beyond all reason. The air was filled with ladybugs flying to and fro, landing on our packs, clothes, and faces. The orange masses in the following pictures are not orange Xanthoria lichens. They are carpets of ladybugs.

September 2009 060

September 2009 061

September 2009 062

September 2009 063

September 2009 065

This guy clearly cannot believe how many ladybugs he is seeing. Either that, or he is laughing at the lady bugs on the photographer.

After consulting the interwebz, it seems what we saw were not native ladybugs, but the Multicolored Asian Lady Beetle, Harmonia axyridis. Unlike our native and presumably sober, upstanding, red-shelled and red-blooded All-American ladybugs, these introduced (from Asia for pest control) guys/gals have multi-colored and variously spotted orange shells. They swarm at the end of summer to find cracks and crevices in which to kick back, order pizza, hook up the cable, and watch 800 hours of the Home & Garden network until spring. Life’s rough sometimes.

In case you were wondering, it’s more proper to call ladybugs “lady beetles” (the scientifically PC term), because true bugs are in the taxon Hemiptera, and our friends are not bugs, but beetles, which form the massive taxon Coleoptera. The most distinguishing character of the beetles are those hard wing covers, known to science by the beautiful name “elytra” (sing. = elytron), which sounds as if it should be the name of a character in a play by Aeschylus. Here you can find the tree containing Coleoptera (the beetles) at the Tree of Life Web Project.

To give you a feel for the kinetics of the situation, here’s a video of the same event taken above Boulder somewhere at the end of July. Next time you want to terrorize the local aphid population without actually buying a gallon of lady beetles, just show this film in your garden.

5D and EX1 Lady Bug Swarm from Michael Ramsey on Vimeo.

And finally, just for kicks, here’s the picnic that inspired this “block party” — a blast from the past for some of us:

{ 2 comments }

The Jelly(nose) Fish

by Jennifer Frazer on September 24, 2009

Because clearly, I can’t get enough of all things jelly . . . I spotted this video at National Geographic today. It seems fairly prosaic until the guy starts . . . er. . . palpitating said jellynose.

Not going to win any fish beauty contests . . . Photo by xxx distributed under a Creative Commons Noncommercial Attribution 3.0 Unported License

Not going to win any beauty contests . . .Ateleopus purpurea. Photo by Rodolfo B. Reyes and Fishbase, distributed under a Creative Commons Noncommercial Attribution 3.0 Unported License

Jellynose fish have cartilaginous bones like sharks, though they are in the same group as bony fishes (Teleosts). They seem to have lost their calcified bones secondarily — yet another case of convergent evolution. Cartilage is a living connective tissue that pads your joints. In cartilaginous fishes, the stiff, flexible stuff is all the skeleton they have, with one big exception: the teeth. That’s why most all we have of those giant Megalodon sharks are their rather imposing choppers (in fact, that’s what Megalodon means: mega (huge-***) + odon (tooth)).

As the video says, we know very little about them because they live in the deep sea. Here’s a reasonably good hierachy of the group (see right side of page); here you can see how they fit into the Tree of Life web project (look for Ateleopodomorpha).

What do you think that jelly nose is for, other than grossing out “sensitive viewers”? Anyone?

{ 5 comments }